SOLO EXCHANGE
SOLO EXCHANGE
SOLO EXCHANGE
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, It is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, It is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, IT and organizational culture do. But it is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, IT and organizational culture do. But it is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, IT and organizational culture do. But it is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, IT and organizational culture do. But it is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, IT and organizational culture do. But it is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
Brands matter, but their value is difficult to quantify. It requires different time periods and/or different markets in which brand equity has experienced significant change. Those contexts are not usually easy to come by. In the absence of experimental or statistical evidence, we are back to conceptualizing the role of brand equity just as those justifying investments in people, IT and organizational culture do. But it is reassuring to know the solid evidence exists to support the general assertion that brand investments, on average, have been shown to pay off
SOLEX CAPITAL LTD.
UNITED KINGDOM
UNITED STATES
KUWAIT
S P A I N
ITALY
We analyse market fundamentals and forecast price movement and develop in-depth research by combining our extensive data models with our network of high-level industry contacts and our forward-looking viewing on all major market trends.
NF6 has developed extensive data models that underpin our analysis. these include:
-
Monthly global balances
-
Detailed supply and demand
-
Imports, exports and trade flows
-
Upcoming major oil, gas and LNG projects
-
refinery capacity, including additions and closures
-
North American oil and gas infrastructure (pipelines, rail, etc.)
-
Power fuel switching models for European and US markets.
-
Short-term and long-term natural gas demand forecast
We combine a data-rich approach with our extensive network of contacts throughout the oil and gas industry and insight on geopolitics and energy policy as well as to provide our clients with indispensable analysis to help guide their investment, trading and strategic decisions.
We also deliver timely analysis of breaking news with our E-mail alert service and offer a selection of subscription services, spanning our research products, which can be tailored to meet your specific needs
We also provide consultancy services to individual clients.